Comments
|
Tanya |
The photo is not of the full pose, which includes a bind. |
|
Belena |
The picture does not help. We need a secondary view that shows the arm and hand position. Even looking at the descriptions and Variations, it is difficult to get a really clear picture of this pose. |
|
Christy |
I agree that this picture is not helpful, though I suspect more research on the site will bring up more explanation. Thanks |
|
hazel |
if you swing your knees to the left and turn your torso to the right, then you do not end up looking like the guy in the photo above. |
|
nikki |
diane- look under the variations |
|
Ram |
Some of these postures require more illustration with pictures from different angles. Its hard to see how the hands are placed. Could you put pics from various angles? Thanks. |
|
Diane |
What about the full pose? What is the arm position in the pose that is shown in the photo? |
|
Anonymous |
i love this one!! |
|
wld |
Sydneye - |
|
bronagh loughlin |
i have never heard of this one before its not in my book! |
Return to article page
